[Dshield] [OT] crippled POP3 service: is this legal?

Doug doug at dwhite.ws
Sat Aug 2 21:06:53 GMT 2003

I have observed a movement among some ISPs toward auto-deleting "read" email
from the email server to conserve disk space.  They haven't, (as yet) adopted
the practice of deleting mail that has not been read, although Hotmail (and some
others) will delete your mail if you have not logged in within a specified
number of days.   Only smaller email providers will still provide IMAP mail
storage (for a small fee).   Most providers strongly encourage the user to
download the mail to the local computer and allow the deletion at the server
level, as in that way they can concentrate their resources on mail transport,
and not mail storage.

>From a privacy perspective, I would assume it would be the better option to POP
your email to the local machine and allow it to be deleted from the server.  The
provider's server logs will still reveal the email messages you have received
and from what IP (mail server) it came from, but not the message itself.

Currently, the only way the Patriot spies can read your email is to place an
intercept online or serve the ISP with papers requiring them to forward a copy
of all your email to an address provided by the spy agency.

This address is  virus scanned by ANTIVIR
mailto:doug at dwhite.ws
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith" <keith at keithbergen.com>
To: "'General DShield Discussion List'" <list at dshield.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Dshield] [OT] crippled POP3 service: is this legal?

| In my opinion, this is a very good way for an ISP to control disk space. I
| know a lot of people that have POP accounts, and they know nothing about how
| to delete messages from the server or not. They can easily check the box
| that says "Keep messages on server", and then very quickly use up their mail
| box space.
| As far a charging for the "Sticky messages" option, I would agree with that
| policy. If you leave messages on the server, then you are using mailbox
| space, and should pay extra. I know that our people at work leave a LOT of
| stuff on the server, and unnecessarily use extra disk space.
| As far as your options, I would look at the other ISPs. You may find that
| they offer sticky mailboxes for free, or maybe they do the same. I certainly
| doubt that there are any laws for or against it.
| In short, I like the option they have implemented, but that's just me.
| Hope this opinion helps,
| Keith.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: list-bounces at dshield.org [mailto:list-bounces at dshield.org] On Behalf
| Of Andre Costa
| Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 2:51 PM
| To: DShield ML
| Subject: [Dshield] [OT] crippled POP3 service: is this legal?
| Hi all,
| this is a little OT, but I thought that you guys might want to share
| your experiences/opinions. If not, please apologize.
| It looks like one of the major Brazilian ISPs modified POP3 behavior by
| making RETR command also DELETE msgs. In other words: if there's only 1
| msg on my mbox, I login, RETR msg 1, quit and login back again, mailbox
| is empty (I have a telnet session dump that shows exactly this, in case
| anyone wants to take a look).
| According to ISP support, you can have access to the "extra feature" of
| "sticky(?) messages" -- but you have to pay more for it. AFAICS this
| "extra feature" is exactly standard POP3 behavior which IMHO I should be
| getting in the first place since I subscribed to POP service.
| Am I tripping here? Is this acceptable behavior? What's your opinion on
| this?
| Andre
| -- 
| Andre Oliveira da Costa
| _______________________________________________
| list mailing list
| list at dshield.org
| To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:
| http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list
| _______________________________________________
| list mailing list
| list at dshield.org
| To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:

More information about the list mailing list