[Dshield] Spam Falloff (was Increased activity)
CraigS at caamb.mb.ca
Tue Aug 19 15:22:09 GMT 2003
I would buy that as well, except I haven't seen similar fall-offs after
other major viruses were released. Has the news coverage about this one
really been that much better that a LOT more people went out and patched /
AV'd / firewalled themselves, compared to a Nimda worm, for example?
Again, I'm not complaining, just seeking to understand.
craigs at caamanitoba.com
From: John D. [mailto:lists at webcrunchers.com]
Sent: 18-Aug-03 21:00
To: General DShield Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Dshield] Spam Falloff (was Increased activity)
>I agree, lot's of computers infected by trojan were probing my NAT
>"firewall" on port 445, when LoveSan went ballistic, hits on 445
>dropped to ZERO. Clueless users forced to clean their machines
>cleaned LOTS of other nasty stuff as well...
That's MY theory as well... (grin)
More information about the list