[Dshield] MSBlast.D a good worm?

Samuel samuel at socal.rr.com
Mon Aug 25 22:34:32 GMT 2003

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Shively" <gshively at pivx.com>
To: "General DShield Discussion List" <list at dshield.org>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Dshield] MSBlast.D a good worm?

> >I don't understand why so many people tolerate spyware that is installed
> >executed without permission. I think it should be prosecuted as a virus
> >something. If the law needs to be changed then people should get the law
> >changed.
> I couldnt agree more. Most spyware actualy exploits vulnerabilities to get
the task of installing and connecting to its master complete.
> What are the legal ramifications to making and hosting a page that
installs spyware and using that installed software to infact SPY?

In addition to spying, it uses the resources of our systems. Isn't that
theft? I often can tell when I need to scan for spyware. When I was using a
system that had very limited resources, spyware was a major user of
available resources. I say that based on performance before and after

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003

More information about the list mailing list