[Dshield] He thinks he is bulletproof, is he?
allan.vanleeuwen at orangemail.nl
Thu Dec 4 15:07:55 GMT 2003
Bulletproof ? I don't think so ...
In the DOS era, all my executable files and my harddrive bootsector have
gotten infected with several DOS based virusses.
They only spread through executable files or via the bootsector on
(removable) drives / disks though.... Which of course minimizes the attack
These virii are not around so much anymore, but a lot of people still
(unknowingly) have version of W95.CIH burnt onto some cdrom or written on to
some floppy. And tell him to upgrade his Opera to the latest version .. As
there was a vulnerability found recently allowing silent installation of
malware through a webpage.
And I remember from a long time ago, by typing a special PING command on a
*nix box, you can keep the CPU on his machine 100% occupied... Even if he
has patched against the ping of death. The ping command was sending
extremely large packets if I remember correctly ....
So no ... He's not really bulletproof, but neither is debian.org or
gentoo.org (as recently proven) and I guess neither is fbi.gov.
From: Kenneth Coney [mailto:superc at visuallink.com]
Sent: donderdag 4 december 2003 7:02
To: list at dshield.org
Subject: [Dshield] He thinks he is bulletproof, is he?
I belong to a group that occasionally sends emails containing proprietary
commercial information from person to person for comment. Recently while
seeking evaluations of a data base program I learned we have a person in
the group who uses a machine with only 16 megs or RAM and who removed (more
or less completely) Internet Explorer from his Windows 95 machine seven or
eight years ago and he has no AV and no firewall. Since MS alerted us to
the RPC vulnerability
(http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp) I have
been trying to get him to upgrade his machine, obtain anti virus software
and firewalls, or at least get any required patches. This is his latest
"I rarely do Windows. I do them at times when I need to view
an MS-Word document with all its pretty fonts and formatting
and/or lines and and boxes and images. If I just need to know
only what the document says I use a program named Antiword to take
a look at it. Antiword does a great job of converting MS-Word to
plain text. Antiword is free and you can download versions of it
for almost all operating systems including even DOS.
Other times when I do Windows are those times when it is really
important for me to take a look at web pages infested with lots
order to get any information from them. None of my DOS-based browsers
of the Unix text browser known as "Lynx" does a great job of getting
into https SSL web pages. I have it installed on my machine. For
doing web-browsing to display inline graphics I use a DOS browser known
as Arachne. It displays web pages just as well as MSIE and NetScape
browser-specific proprietary HTML tags. Also Arachne doesn't do SSL.
used the Lynx browser on several occasions for doing online shopping
and ordering merchandise by using a secure web page.
I have the understanding that as long as I am using a DOS-only machine
there is no way a hacker could invade my machine while I am online
without my noticing that something very bizarre and fishy is happening
inside my system.
For going to web pages with my Windows 95 machine I use the Opera
browser. It isn't as bloated as the current versions of MSIE and
NetScape and it runs fine on systems having only 16MB of memory.
I never use a Windows machine for doing email. When I am at a public
terminal running a Windows machine I do my email by running Pine on
my Unixish shell account. I can get into my shell account on the remote
computer by running a Java Applet that does SSH which I can access from
a web browser. When I finish my session the Java Applet self-destructs,
BTW, I have never received from anyplace on the internet a virus or
a worm capable of infecting a DOS system. I have received thousands of
viruses and worms that are capable of infecting Windows 32 bit systems
only. That is why I don't do my email with a Windows system."
I suspect he is very vulnerable to something, but lack enough root
knowledge of TCP/IP and DOS to speak with certainty. I agree he is safer
than many, even safer than some with firewalls and AV software in that most
virus writers these days don't seem to be expecting a DOS based machine,
but I suspect he isn't as malware proof as he thinks. He on the other hand
believes he is completly bullet proof to all forms of malware and
probe/infection attempts. I'd like a second opinion.
list mailing list
list at dshield.org
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is alleen
bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt,
wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te
informeren door het bericht te retourneren. Hoewel Orange maatregelen heeft
genomen om virussen in deze email of attachments te voorkomen, dient u ook
zelf na te gaan of virussen aanwezig zijn aangezien Orange niet
aansprakelijk is voor computervirussen die veroorzaakt zijn door deze
The information contained in this message may be confidential and is
intended to be only for the addressee. Should you receive this message
unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail. Although Orange has taken steps to ensure that
this email and attachments are free from any virus, you do need to verify
the possibility of their existence as Orange can take no responsibility for
any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email.
More information about the list