[RE: [Dshield] mail1.giac.net spamcop listed]
rick at jaray.net
Fri Dec 12 18:49:39 GMT 2003
Geeze.. let's lay this one to rest?
SpamCop like any other "free" blacklist system is an effective "tool". It
should NOT be the sole/single tool to use to combat spam but rather used in
conjunction with other blacklist's and filters for a positive confirmation
that the source is spam. Personally, in a business environment, I would
have the filters set so tight that just 1 piece of spam would bar all email
from that source for 6 months and I would not accept mail from them until a
10,000.00 dollar bond was received and held for 6 months. If no more spam
received after that then the money would be returned. (Got your attention
huh? - yep it's all about money) I wrote SpamCop concerning DShield and they
did respond and subsequently d-listed them. Scott from Declude has a very
current list of spam databases that most 'real' email admins use
combinations of http://www.declude.com/Junkmail/support/ip4r.htm
What I would vote for would be a Global bl server system (right next to the
root DNS Servers) that would sync and balance out known spammers.
off the soapbox.. thanks for your attention,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list-bounces at dshield.org [mailto:list-bounces at dshield.org]On
> Behalf Of Andy Stevko
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:41 AM
> To: General DShield Discussion List; General DShield Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [RE: [Dshield] mail1.giac.net spamcop listed]
> Spamcop's business practices have one flaw that really taints
> their service.
> When someone reports a spam incident, spamcop forwards the email to the
> standard abuse or postmaster mailboxes. BUT they completely stripped all
> significant headers out of the email such that it is impossible
> to unsubscribe
> the person who compained. They won't even share that information
> when asked
> for it.
> This behavior keeps spamcop's bl fat of folks who really want to be
> responsible emailers.
> "Matthew Harrell" <mhar at plex.com> wrote:
> > Ah, but that is inherent in the nature of spamcop. We are
> fairly regularly
> > listed in spamcop's database because people forget that they
> filled out a
> > rebate offer for a major retailer. One of our customers handles rebate
> > offers, and when they send e-mail regarding the rebate offer,
> it frequently
> > gets sent to spamcop as spam. It's an ongoing headache that I'm quite
> > tired of dealing with.
> > -----------------
> > Matt Harrell
> > Plexus Systems
> > mhar at plex.com
> > ----- On 12/11/2003 9:58 PM, Hanke Penning
> <hanke.penning at iap.de> wrote:
> > >Hello out there!
> > >
> > > > Even though spamcop clearly states (www.spamcop.net/bl) that the
> > > > list should not be used for production servers, people do.
> > >
> > > Yes, for example, I do. Spamcop ist one of the best services. The
> > > problem in this case is *not* spamcop, but the dshield user
> who reported
> > > his dshield-confirmations as spam.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > list mailing list
> > > list at dshield.org
> > > To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:
> > http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > list mailing list
> > list at dshield.org
> > To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:
> Andy Stevko mailto:andy.stevko at usa.net
> "If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too
> much space."
> list mailing list
> list at dshield.org
> To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:
> Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
More information about the list