[Dshield] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Messenger Pop up SpamonUDP Port 1026

Serge Vondandamo svondandamo at mercury-eur.com
Fri Jun 27 11:01:42 GMT 2003

Great Charles,


-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:shiva at sewingwitch.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:48 AM
To: General DShield Discussion List
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Dshield] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Messenger
Popup SpamonUDP Port 1026

--On Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:09 AM +0200 Stephane Grobety
<security at admin.fulgan.com> wrote:

> Another option is simply to have different contracts for "home users"
> and for "experts and business".

Better to call it "novice" and "expert" (as I think SpeakEasy does).
one pays more for "business" service, but "experts" should require less tech
support, and therefore shouldn't have to pay a premium just to be left

I continue to think of SpeakEasy as the most enlightened of ISP's when
with expert users. As long as one doesn't do something to get them in
(eg. open proxies and illegal content hosting), they leave one alone to use
one's bandwidth as one wishes.

list mailing list
list at dshield.org
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:

More information about the list mailing list