[Dshield] SCO still blocked by xo.net

Lauro, John jlauro at umflint.edu
Mon Feb 2 17:36:16 GMT 2004


> A traceroute from Seattle WA gets as far as it did 24 hours 
> ago: to what many think is the handoff from xo.net into SCO's 
> own network:

That's fine for WWW2.SCO.COM, or other working domains at sco.com.  I
get similar trace routes.  Try one to the *OLD* IP of
SCO.COM/www.sco.com or the unchanged IP for calderasystems.com.  That
is where the traceroute is interesting....  Namely: trace to
216.250.120.12...

  7    19 ms    18 ms    18 ms
g3.ba21.b002281-1.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [38.1
12.7.9]
  8    20 ms    21 ms    19 ms  g2-2.core01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com
[66.28.66.8
1]
  9    19 ms    20 ms    18 ms  p6-0.pr01.ord03.atlas.psi.net
[154.54.2.238]
 10  fe9-1.IR1.Chicago2-IL.us.xo.net [206.111.2.177]  reports:
Destination host
unreachable.




> 
>  1  greatwall (192.168.1.2)  10.590 ms  56.027 ms  3.633 ms
>  2  10.130.176.1 (10.130.176.1)  179.188 ms  10.460 ms  8.123 
> ms  3  12.244.82.65 (12.244.82.65)  8.861 ms  8.844 ms  
> 12.272 ms  4  12.244.64.1 (12.244.64.1)  11.625 ms  9.158 ms  
> 10.052 ms  5  12.119.199.21 (12.119.199.21)  15.706 ms  
> 16.425 ms  13.892 ms  6  gbr1-p20.st6wa.ip.att.net 
> (12.123.44.146)  10.109 ms  11.074 ms  9.165 ms  7  
> tbr1-p012501.st6wa.ip.att.net (12.122.12.157)  12.301 ms  
> 16.663 ms  17.660 ms  8  tbr2-cl1.sffca.ip.att.net 
> (12.122.12.113)  30.131 ms  27.225 ms  26.324 ms  9  
> ggr1-p370.sffca.ip.att.net (12.123.13.69)  26.732 ms  28.289 
> ms  31.053 ms 10  p14-0.IR1.PaloAlto-CA.us.xo.net 
> (206.111.12.145)  28.253 ms  28.221 ms  29.428 ms 11  
> p5-2-0.RAR2.SanJose-CA.us.xo.net (65.106.5.177)  28.636 ms  
> 30.592 ms  29.897 ms 12  p6-0-0.RAR1.LA-CA.us.xo.net 
> (65.106.0.17)  37.025 ms  39.498 ms  34.614 ms 13  
> p0-0-0-0.RAR2.LA-CA.us.xo.net (65.106.1.50)  41.420 ms  
> 37.581 ms  36.662 ms14  p4-0-0.MAR2.SaltLake-UT.us.xo.net 
> (65.106.5.74)  71.232 ms  69.498 ms  98.209 ms 15  
> p15-0.CHR1.SaltLake-UT.us.xo.net (207.88.83.46)  68.556 ms  
> 116.032 ms  70.237 ms 16  205.158.14.114.ptr.us.xo.net 
> (205.158.14.114)  68.760 ms  80.279 ms  70.288 ms 17  * * * 
> 18  * * * 19  *
> 
> 
> 
> But discussion on the NANOG (North America Network Operators 
> Group) maillist suggest that, despite what SCO has said, SCO 
> is not actively being blocked by any, or by very very few, 
> ISP/network operators.
> 
> SCO itself seems to be playing mostly DNS games.
> 

I disagree.  Although not all of SCO is not being blocked, it's very
clear that one IP is...  Namely 216.250.128.12.






More information about the list mailing list