[unisog] Wireless in residence building - Tricky problem
mitch at ccmr.cornell.edu
Wed Nov 5 19:05:42 GMT 2003
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Stephen C Woods wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:13:30PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Marc Jimenez wrote:
> > > > Two signal strength-and-direction reading 10-15 foot apart in the hallway
> > > > and some triangulation would do it. It's the electromagnetic version
> > > > of "which room has the annoyingly loud stereo in it?", which is also
> > > > solvable without a search warrant.... :)
> > >
> > > Absolutely true, we can certainly determine to *our* satisfaction that the
> > > AP is in the room, but incontravertable proof (which is what our school's
> > > disciplinary board requires) is a bit harder to come by. If you've got a
> > > more ... reasonable ... set of proof requirements, more power to you. I
> > > wish I did....
> > I don't see why triangulation wouldn't be considered incontravertable,
> > though it's safer to do it with 3 samples, since doing it with 2 only
> > gets you to one of 2 possible locations.
> Well it you can pick up a 100Mw 2.4GHz signal from the other side of the
When using 2 sampling points that produce 2 possible locations, the
2nd possible location is not on the other side of the earth. It's on
the other side of the line segment that connects the 2 sampling points.
> You don't need incontravertable all you need is enough to convince a
> judge to get a warrant. It's a real strong signal and our
> triangaluation indicates it's originating 3 feet from the inside of the
> wall of that room. With a warrant you can get the University Police
> to enter the room and see the AP sitting on the table.
...if you took the 2 sampling points from the hallway outside the room,
as suggested, then the 2nd possible location is in the room directly
across the hall from the suspected room!
More information about the unisog