[Fwd: Re: [unisog] spam detection rates]
b.zdrnja at auckland.ac.nz
Thu Nov 18 00:12:39 GMT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Fulton [mailto:r.fulton at auckland.ac.nz]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 November 2004 12:11 p.m.
> To: Bojan Zdrnja
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: [unisog] spam detection rates]
> include unisog at lists.sans.org in any reply...
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Eric Peters <epeters at pcthome.com>
> To: UNIversity Security Operations Group <unisog at lists.sans.org>
> Subject: Re: [unisog] spam detection rates
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:14:50 -0800
> Do you guys plan on releasing the paper if so I would like to give it a
> read maybe a step by step guide on getting it setup and your trials and
> tribulations in doing so. One question I have though is how did you get
Yes, we plan to release a paper of how to setup identical system as ours - I
hope to do it over the xmas break as things should get quiet then.
> Dspam and SA to play nice with each other? I tried a similar setup but
> failed miserably and just stuck with MailScanner which works great.
Dspam can be pretty difficult to setup by itself. Our system uses
amavisd-new, (http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd), which, in it's newer
versions support calling of dspam as well. Basically it calls dspam on each
message and with an added rule it adds it's score to the final score
produced by SpamAssassin.
More information about the unisog