[unisog] Is anyone using the Cisco FWSM

Huba Leidenfrost huba at uidaho.edu
Fri Jul 1 17:57:28 GMT 2005


I don't understand what your sentence "Cisco fwsm needs a switch for force
on ip addresses instead of names so you can study ip ranges." means.  Would
you please explain what you mean?

Thanks,
Huba Leidenfrost
huba at uidaho.edu
ITS Security Analyst
University of Idaho
208.885.2126/7539(fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: unisog-bounces at lists.sans.org [mailto:unisog-bounces at lists.sans.org]
On Behalf Of Allen Rueter
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:59 AM
To: UNIversity Security Operations Group
Subject: Re: [unisog] Is anyone using the Cisco FWSM


Lucent Brick is better too.

Cisco fwsm needs a switch for force on ip addresses instead of names so you
can study ip ranges.

Allen Rueter

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:54:10PM -0500, Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar
wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I am running a Cisco FWSM blade over here.I've been testing "Cisco VMS 
> 2.3/Monitoring Center for Security 2.0" in order to analyze logs from 
> FWSM.
> Altough I'm not done with my testings yet,my impression is that its 
> logging details are not as informative as a Checkpoint Firewall-1 
> Management Center which I used to run.
> Is anybody here who runs Cisco FWSM and share his/her experiences on 
> logging tools?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> JaimeO
> 


-- 

Allen P. Rueter              314/935-6429 Fx:314/935-7302
Director of CTS              allen at cts.wustl.edu
Camp Box 1045 Bryan Rm 509     ___ ___ ___
Washington University         / __|_ _/ __|
One Brookings Dr.            | (__ | |\__ \
St. Louis MO  63130           \____|_|____/
Office: 406B Lopata
_______________________________________________
unisog mailing list
unisog at lists.sans.org
http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/unisog




More information about the unisog mailing list