[unisog] RIAA in violation of DMCA requirements?
ben_beuchler at mcad.edu
Tue Oct 4 18:52:47 GMT 2005
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 02:34:51PM -0400, Christopher E. Cramer wrote:
> 2) To a large extent these notices are not legally relevant for alleged
> p2p infringement. Section 512(c) which contains the provisions for
> notification is only for material residing on the servers of an ISP. The
> notifications aren't relevant for allegedly infringing material traversing
> our networks. These conduit activities are covered under section 512(a)
> which does not discuss notification and take down procedures.
> So, I think that it is reasonable to treat these as a useful educational
> opportunity for talking to students without considering them to be legally
> binding on your university.
For what it's worth, I spent about an hour on the phone with an EFF
attorney a few months back, and that was essentially their opinion as
well: Notify and takedown is not relevant if we're only providing
transport. Of course, any infringing material in a student's
school-provided web space is another matter entirely.
Ben Beuchler Minneapolis College of Art and Design
Network Administrator ben_beuchler at mcad.edu
More information about the unisog