[unisog] HEA §494 Campus-based DigitalTheft Prevention

Newman, Mark Edward mnx at utk.edu
Mon Dec 3 15:57:06 GMT 2007

I agree and am also speaking for myself...why ~should~ the universities
be required to spend money so that the entertainment industry can make

In my opinion, no college or university should be "burdened" with this
at all. It is almost as if the entertainment industry is ~using~ us as
part of their revenue generation machinery. 

On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 10:12 -0500, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> --On Friday, November 30, 2007 10:03 -0500 William Yang <wyang at gcfn.net> 
> wrote:
> >>> (2) develop a plan for offering alternatives to illegal downloading or
> >>> peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property as well as a plan
> >>> to explore technology-based deterrents to prevent such illegal
> >>> activity.
> > This doesn't look particularly harsh.  I'm not reading the whole thing,
> > but this section doesn't strike me as an unreasonable burden on
> > Universities.
> Why should universities be required to spend any money at all developing
> alternatives to illegal downloading?  The entertainment industry should
> be doing that.
> I am speaking for myself, not my employer.
> Joseph Brennan
> Columbia University Information Technology
> _______________________________________________
> unisog mailing list
> unisog at lists.dshield.org
> https://lists.sans.org/mailman/listinfo/unisog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.sans.org/pipermail/unisog/attachments/20071203/7800d8ee/attachment.bin 

More information about the unisog mailing list