[unisog] Still need a "security" address?
r.fulton at auckland.ac.nz
Thu Feb 22 05:31:36 GMT 2007
Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>> Is it out of line to consider assigning the email alias "security AT
>> Oberlin DOT edu" to the folks in blue while expecting /network/ security
>> issues to be addressed to "abuse?"
> Well, RFC 2142 clearly states that "security@<site>" should
> be associated with "Security bulletins and queries" (under
> the Network Operations area, long before most sites even
> had the concept of a separate cyber security group).
After I had persuaded Unisafe that having an email alias was a good idea
the immediately wanted 'security' I pointed to RFC 2142 and said "no
way" but we will gateway it for you. As I have said elsewhere that
works well. About once every two or three weeks we get an email for
building security and I have a stock email that I send to the originator
politely point out the correct address. The invariable response is
More information about the unisog