[unisog] Barracuda effectiveness (vs Puremessage)
frnkblk at iname.com
Tue Jul 17 19:23:57 GMT 2007
My apologies, I confused NJABL's delisting policy and reputation with that
From: unisog-bounces at lists.dshield.org
[mailto:unisog-bounces at lists.dshield.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Brennan
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:09 PM
To: UNIversity Security Operations Group
Subject: Re: [unisog] Barracuda effectiveness (vs Puremessage)
--On Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:35 -0500 Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com>
> najbl.org is not a very well-respected RBL (just look at the de-listing
> policy!), I would recommend that you re-evaluate using it. We've had
> nothing but trouble with that RBL.
We have used NJABL for a few years and have never had any problem.
That is, no complaint about a false positive has ever led me to a
message blocked based on NJABL.
What's wrong with the de-listing policy? Lower half of this page:
We check Spamhaus first, and if that matches we don't check NJABL.
As a result we have lopsided results like yesterday, 818,878 matched
Spamhaus and 5,747 matched NJABL-- that is, NJABL matched 5,747 that
Spamhaus did not get. That's enough to be worthwhile.
Lead Email Systems Engineer
Columbia University Information Technology
unisog mailing list
unisog at lists.dshield.org
More information about the unisog