[unisog] Barracuda effectiveness (vs Puremessage)
sdier at oitsec.umn.edu
Thu Jul 19 16:14:14 GMT 2007
Anyone know if there is any appliance-style solutions that utilize
dspam? Or even a turn-key (ala smoothwall-style, stick in a cd and go)
project utilizing dspam? I've had a ton of success with my personal
mail using it. I'm sitting at 97.5% accuracy over ~76k mails, but it
depends on training the filter constantly -- Spam identification is only
88.8% though. I've not seen a false positive in a long time, either.
paul wehner wrote:
> A decent spam defense has not, and likely will not ever, come about from
> the personal opinion of management.
> Careful research and evaluation is required of the market leaders.
> MS is not a market leader in spam defense and it would not be where I
> started my research.
> And I have 10 years experience with Exchange.
> Lee Weers wrote:
>> My supervisor is unhappy with the amount of spam that is getting through
>> our Barracuda and has asked me to research Microsoft's Exchange Hosted
>> services product. Has anybody tested or switch to Microsoft for their
>> antispam filtering? How do you like it, how configurable to the user is
>> it? How is the reporting?
>> -----Original Message-----
Scott Dier <sdier at oitsec.umn.edu>
More information about the unisog